Giving up on treaty and ILS isn’t the right answer to Markel’s critics
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
  • Print
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Free Trial
  • Log in

Giving up on treaty and ILS isn’t the right answer to Markel’s critics

Indirect exposure to cat risk through long-term investors gives Markel optionality.

By Fiona Robertson
March 17, 2025
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
  • Print
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Markel Ryan Specialty Lockton New York 1185 Ave Americas.jpg

Nephila owner Markel is currently working on a review of its operations after coming under activist shareholder pressure.

Recently, sister title Insurance Insider US argued that activist concerns over Markel’s PE investing activities (through its Markel Ventures brand) were misplaced,...

Subscribers, log in here:

Fuel a smarter strategy with our actionable market intelligence

      • Gain a competitive edge and accelerate decision-making
      • Be empowered by insights that transform confusion to clarity
      • Uncover growth opportunities and prepare for potential threats
      • Fuel a smarter strategy for business growth
Request a free trial Already a subscriber? Log in now

Topics

Opinion ILS managers Property treaty Operations/tech Markel Nephila Capital Capital raising North America ILS Stocks Casualty/GL
Gift this article